Showing posts with label assessment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label assessment. Show all posts

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Pruduct Swap with Jen Runde... With Love for Taten

It's time for another Product Swap hosted by Jessica Stanford from Mrs. Stanford's Class. Here's how it works: Two bloggers trade products and then review how the products were used in their classrooms. Such fun!


My partner for the product swap is Jen Runde. THE Jen Runde (like there could be any other?!) from Runde's Room. Cue giddy music (If you find some, let me know). Jen Runde is one of my bloggy idols! She could be the Princess of Product Swapping... Here's a picture of Jen... without her glasses...
Artwork by Nikki at Melonheadz HERE on TpT
Well, to be honest, Jen Runde is ALSO the Princess of NICE. And KIND. And CARING. I could give you lots of examples, but instead I'll just give you one...

This is Taten. He is a classmate of one of Jen's daughters. And right now, he is fighting cancer. Sigh. I don't think kids should ever have to face cancer...

And if you head over to Runde's Room you can read about him. Bring a tissue. You'll need it by the end of the blog post.

So here is how Jen is helping Taten... and YOU can help too!

First, Jen is having a SALE at her TpT Store (WooHoo! Don't you love a sale?!). It's a sale on EVERYTHING! Second, ALL of the proceeds from Jen's sales this weekend will go to help Taten. Such goodness. It's like getting two scoops of ice cream when you only asked for one!


Yep, I told you she was a princess!

 

And if you're looking for something to buy (and I know you won't have any trouble because there are so many great things), I am recommending the Math Reflection fans. This is the product that I tried out in my class this week...



Here are some details from the product:  

This resource contains over 100 different math reflection questions and prompts to use for comprehension checks of new concepts learned. They can be used for the reflection section in  Interactive Math Journals as questions to respond to in regular math journals, after problem-solving activities, for oral discussions, in math centers, after new lessons in math, as an end of the unit review, or beginning of the unit diagnostic, or for test preparation.

These questions would be PERFECT for use in Interactive Math Journals because they push the students toward higher levels of thinking. And, recognizing that students process and share information in different ways, the questions are aligned to various levels of Blooms Taxonomy--the updated one that are so much more student (and teacher!) friendly...


There are 6 different groups of questions and prompts - one group for each of the levels in Bloom’s  Revised Taxonomy.: Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create.  Each group of questions will make its own fan.  You can use a particular fan when evaluating a particular level of the taxonomy, or use different fans as they suit different learned concepts.  You could also group all the questions together on a binder clip circle and hang near your desk for easy access during activities.  I choose one or two particular questions or prompts that fit the concept, and display them under the document camera for the students to see.

I love that the questions are grouped (according to Bloom's Revised Taxonomy) and color-coded. (Okay, I admit: That always wins extra points with me! Give me a way to organize a resource and I am happy!). The icons on the left helped me keep the questions in the right group, and my students were completely taken with them (you never know what is going to interest a sixth grader!) Here are my cards coming out of the printer. LOVE the purple ones!


I was already giving some "quick checks" in my classroom, so I used Jen's questions to double assess. That sounds bad--but it was actually a great idea! I got two different kinds of responses... which allowed me to get a clearer picture of my students' thinking.

I also tried three different approaches: Let the students choose their question fan, allowing students to choose from a level (of Blooms) matched with a type of question, and my own selection of questions matched to assessment items. Here's a little secret: All three approaches worked well!

Here they are... hard at work!

We used the questions with area and circumference...


And with fractions...


And with ratio and proportions...


And with calculating angles...


The kids really enjoyed being able to use a different kind of thinking. Some of their particular favorites...although I could list MANY...




Today we used the questions as part of an assessment, but there are a lot of questions that are perfect to guide work done with a partner. I love how it can focus higher level thinking... and there is very little prep work necessary to see them. And, these same questions can be used over and over in different combinations with specific questions selected to meet the needs of the task.


Finally, Jen knows that most teachers will have questions specific to their grade level. So, being the forward-thinking person that she is, she included blank question cards onto which you can write your OWN questions! So, aside from the 100-plus questions Jen has provided, there is still room to personalize these materials and make them your very own!

So now you have some things to do...

1.  Click on the blog button below to go to Jen's blog and read about Taten.


2.  Go to Jen's store and check out her wonderful products. Remember the proceeds from all of her sales this weekend go to helping Taten.
 
3.  Try out these Math Reflection Fans. There are so MANY ways to use them in the classroom, and I know you will be pleased with the chance to see your students' thinking in a different light.


4. Link up with the Magical Product Swap by clicking on the button below to take you to the Linky. Lots of bloggers will be reviewing products in the next or two so it's a chance to have someone try out a product for you--so you know how it works before you buy.

MrsStanfordsClass

5. And when you click on the Product Swap button, you'll be admiring Michelle's (3am Teacher's) work. She's the one who designed the button. Isn't is Cute! While you're at TpT, check out her clip art. Right now, I am obsessed with her gardening sets!


6. Enjoy your day. It's be a long tough week for many people across the globe. So, today, I hope we can focus on good things... enjoy someone's company, say Hi to a stranger, offer help, give a hug...

Artwork by Creative Clips by Krista Wallden HERE on TpT




Monday, July 16, 2012

Skipping Ahead... Guided Math, Chapter 8

We're skipping ahead through Guided Math by Laney Sammons and arriving at chapter eight!


If you are interested in joining the study, click on the graphic to the left to get an overview of the Book Study at Primary Inspired. Brenda does a great job of explaining the Book Study adventure!  She has organized this study so that we can all learn from one another.  You can also click on the guided math tab below her blog header. She's got everything organized there!





Chapter 8 is brought to you by Finding Joy in 6th Grade. Hey! That's MY Bloggy Button! That's because it's my turn to be the hostess!




             
I am sharing these duties with Guided Math Study Group. Why don't you hop over there and read Suzanne's perspective too


With the help of KPM Doodles' sweet borders, I am addressing each chapter in two parts:

1) What stood out to me in the book chapter and 2) How I might use this new learning to shape the way I teach math to sixth graders....

So, let's get started...




          The eighth chapter in the book is entitled:
          Assessment in Guided Math









It is common knowledge that assessment drives instruction. "The more teachers know about their students' learning during instruction, the more accurately instruction can be tailored to meet their unique needs" (Guided Math, Laney Sammons, 2010, p.227). Including students in the assessment process allows them to assess their own understanding and to set goals for further learning.

Sammons presses the reader to differentiate between assessment and evaluation.  By her definition, the ongoing formal and informal collection of evidence  that is used to inform teaching practice is considered assessment. "With assessment, a large amount of information is collected from a relatively small number of students.... this process is assessment for learning, rather than solely of learning" (Guided Math, Laney Sammons, 2010, p.228).

By contrast, evaluation is the determination of whether or not students have learned the information--and how well this has been accomplished. In this case, a small amount of information is gathered from a large number of students. "Evaluations are frequently used as forms of accountability, for reporting student progress to others, or used to identify trends" (Making Classroom Assessment Work, A. Davies, 2000  in Guided Math, Laney Sammons, 2010, p.228).

Assessment and evaluations both have a place in determining students' learning and planning for instruction. Sammons cites Fountas and Pinnell (1996) in listing the following rational for systemic assessment:
  • continually informing teaching decisions
  • systematically assessing students' strengths and knowledge
  • finding out what students can do, both independently and with teacher support
  • documenting progress for parents and students
  • summarizing achievement and learning over a given period--six weeks, a year, or longer
  • reporting to administrators, school board members, and various stakeholders in the community
 (Guided Math, Laney Sammons, 2010, p.228-229)

Sammons is careful to include the role of the student when designing assessment. "Students improve their performances and increase their learning when they know precisely what they have done well and exactly what they need to do to improve, and then are given opportunities to do so" (Guided Math, Laney Sammons, 2010, p.229) The importance of specific feedback cannot be underestimated in helping guide students to improve their understanding of the concepts being taught and to improve the quality of their analysis of their own learning.

Sammons again cites Davis (Making Classroom Assessment Work, A. Davies, 2000) in listing the three steps for teachers to follow in linking descriptions of learning to instruction:
  • Describe what the students will need to learn in a language that students and parents will understand
  • Share the description with students and explain how it relates to success in life outside of school
  • Use the description to guide instruction, assessment and evaluation.
Towards this end, Sammons discusses the relative merits of checklists and rubrics. Checklists are more easily created than rubrics, but they do not provide as much information to guide the student toward improving performance. Rubrics are more difficult to create, but they provide students with descriptors of quality for each of the criteria that have been established for the assignment. In either case, involving the students in the generation of checklists and rubrics is a critical step. Further, modeling the use of these tools and giving the students opportunity to evaluate exemplars leads to more skill in critiquing their own learning.

The provision of specific descriptive feedback allows the teacher to share with the student the things that he has done well and the areas in which there is room for improvement. This feedback should come during the learning as well as afterwards. In this way, students have an opportunity to USE the feedback to adjust what they are doing.

Sammons cites Davis (Making Classroom Assessment Work, A. Davies, 2000) in describing descriptive feedback as that which:
  • comes during and after the learning
  • is easily understood
  • is related directly to the learning
  • is specific, so that performance can improve
  • involves choice on the part of the learner as to the type of feedback and how to receive it
  • is part of the ongoing conversation about learning
  • is in comparison to models, exemplars, samples and descriptions
  • is about the performance of the work--not the person
As students become more confident and more adept at evaluating their own learning, they become better able to set goals for their future learning. This type of ownership helps to increase student motivation which can further increase student performance.

Finally, Sammons addresses the importance of assessing student performance so as to maximize the benefit of grouping for instruction during Guided Math. Much like Guided Reading, students may join and leave a group based on assessment data. The recognition of theimportance of flexibility in grouping leads to the most effective use of teaching time spent in Guided Math groups.



Of all of the things I have read about Guided Math, the ideas presented in this chapter will likely be the hardest for me to implement. It's not that this type of assessment is a bad idea--in fact, it is a GREAT idea!

Reviewing the discussion  of descriptive feedback (Davis) leaves me unsettled. That list could easily generate a book all its own.  I will need to look at this list as an ideal, not something that can be accomplished by the end of September (by me or by the students!)

This type of assessment and the related thinking will involve a lot of planning. This is easy to see if you review the process in reverse: Students should have a role in assessing their own work. Which means that students should be involved in the development of rubrics. This requires that assignments must be developed that allow for a comprehensive-yet measurable--response. This, in turn, hinges on students' ability to evaluate a response of product critically (rather than simply checking off each component, which is what my students so often do).

As an additional consideration, much of this work requires students to be fairly proficient in using language to communicate responses and to evaluate their own responses and those of others. This may present an obstacle to many students who are learning English as a second language. An acknowledgement of this contingency and the determination to plan around it is simply another consideration in making Guided Math work and work well.

All in all, assessment is an area where I may need to give myself some grace. Like all of the topics presented in Guided Math, there is room for growth. We want students to move forward, assessing their own learning and then setting goals to take on additional challenges. The same will be true for me as I attempt to improve my assessment of students' work by using rubrics and checklists, all while keeping standards in mind.

"Assessment not only keep students accountable, it keeps teachers accountable" (Guided Math, Laney Sammons, 2010, p.244). I am ready to let this type of accountability better guide my teaching practice, and, in turn, guide my students' mathematical learning.


We're almost to the end of the book! The final chapter in Guided Math will be hosted at two different sites on July 20th: Second Grade Math Maniac and The Creative Apple. Be sure you link up with them when the time arrives.


                                                  

I've enjoyed this journey with you (even though I didn't always post the chapters that I finished), and I found my first online Book Study to be a valuable learning experience--and much better than many PD meetings I've attended--in part, because I was surrounded by so many BlogFriends who really wanted to explore the information and learn new things.

Now it's your turn! I have now learned how to add an Inlinkz button to link up your learning about chapter eight. If you haven't read the book--or if you have read it and don't have a blog post--I'd still love for you to share your thoughts. Just leave a comment in the Comments section.

Good luck in your own exploration of Guided Math. As always, thanks for stopping by...